计算数学 ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 19-33.DOI: 10.12286/jssx.j2020-0748

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

非自治刚性随机微分方程正则EM分裂方法的收敛性和稳定性

余妍妍, 代新杰, 肖爱国   

  1. 湘潭大学数学与计算科学学院, 湘潭 411105
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-22 出版日期:2022-02-14 发布日期:2022-02-14
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金（12071403）和湖南省教育厅科学研究项目（21A0108）资助
PDF ( 182 ) 引用

余妍妍, 代新杰, 肖爱国. 非自治刚性随机微分方程正则EM分裂方法的收敛性和稳定性[J]. 计算数学, 2022, 44(1): 19-33.

Yu Yanyan, Dai Xinjie, Xiao Aiguo. CONVERGENCE AND STABILITY OF THE CANONICAL EM SPLITTING METHOD FOR NONAUTONOMOUS STIFF STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS[J]. Mathematica Numerica Sinica, 2022, 44(1): 19-33.

CONVERGENCE AND STABILITY OF THE CANONICAL EM SPLITTING METHOD FOR NONAUTONOMOUS STIFF STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

Yu Yanyan, Dai Xinjie, Xiao Aiguo   

  1. School of Mathematics and Computational Science, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China
  • Received:2020-10-22 Online:2022-02-14 Published:2022-02-14
本文研究了数值求解非自治随机微分方程的正则Euler-Maruyama分裂（CEMS）方法，该方程的漂移项系数带有刚性且允许超线性增长，扩散项系数满足全局Lipschitz条件.首先，证明了CEMS方法的强收敛性及收敛速度.其次，证明了在适当条件下CEMS方法是均方稳定的.进一步，利用离散半鞅收敛定理，研究了CEMS方法的几乎必然指数稳定性.结果表明，CEMS方法在漂移系数的刚性部分满足单边Lipschitz条件下可保持几乎必然指数稳定性.最后通过数值实验，检验了CEMS方法的有效性并证实了我们的理论结果.
关键词： 非自治刚性随机微分方程, 正则Euler-Maruyama分裂方法, 收敛性, 稳定性
This paper studies the canonical Euler——Maruyama splitting (CEMS) method for numerically solving non-autonomous stochastic differential equations. The drift coefficient of the equation is stiff and allows super-linear growth, and the diffusion coefficient satisfies the global Lipschitz condition. First, we prove the CEMS method is strongly convergent and discuss the convergence rate. Second, it is proved that the CEMS method is stable in mean square sense under mild conditions. Further, using the discrete semi-martingale convergence theorem, the almost surely exponential stability of the CEMS method is studied. The results show that the CEMS method can preserve almost surely exponential stability when the stiff part of drift cofficient satisfies the one-sided Lipschitz condition. Finally, numerical experiments verify the effectiveness of the CEMS method and confirm our theoretical results.
Key words: Non-autonomous stiff stochastic differential equations, Canonical Euler-Maruyama splitting method, Convergence, Stability

MR(2010)主题分类: 

()
[1] Van Kampen N G. Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry[M]. Netherlands, 1992.
[2] Bodo B A, Thompson M E, Unny T E. A review on stochastic differential equations for application in hydrology[J]. Stoch. Hydrol. Hydraul., 1987, 1:81-100.
[3] Maruyama G. Continuous Markov processes and stochastic equations[J]. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo., 1955, 4:48-90.
[4] Milstein G. Approximate integration of stochastic differential equations[J]. Theory Probab. Appl., 1974, 19:557-562.
[5] Kloeden P E, Platen E. Numerical solution of stochastic differential equations[M]. Berlin:Springer, 1992.
[6] Kloeden P E, Platen E, Schurz H. The numerical solution of non-linear stochastic dynamical systems:A brief introduction[J]. Int. J. Bif. Chaos., 1991, 1:277-286.
[7] Hutzenthaler M, Jentzen A, Kloeden P E. Strong and weak divergence in finite time of Euler's method for SDEs with non-globally Lipschitz continuous coefficients[J]. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 2011, 467:1563-1576.
[8] Hutzenthaler M, Jentzen A, Kloeden P E. Strong convergence of an explicit numerical method for SDEs with non-globally Lipschitz continuous coefficients[J]. 2012, arXiv:1010.3756v1.
[9] Wang X J, Gan S Q. The tamed Milstein method for commutative stochastic differential equations with non-globally Lipschitz continuous coefficients[J]. J. Difference Equ. Appl., 2013, 19(3):466-490.
[10] Mao X R. The truncated Euler-Maruyama method for stochastic differential equations[J]. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 2015, 290:370-384.
[11] Guo Q, Liu W, Mao X R, Yue R X. The truncated Milstein method for stochastic differential equations with commutative noise[J]. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 2018, 338:298-310.
[12] Li S F, Li Y F. B-convergence theory of Runge-Kutta methods for stiff Volterra functional differential equations with infinite integration interval[J]. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 2015, 53(6):2570-2583.
[13] Higham D J. Mean-square and asymptotic stability of the stochastic theta method[J]. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 2000, 38(3):753-769.
[14] Kloeden P E, Platen E, Schurz H. The numerical solution of nonlinear stochastic dynamical systems:a brief introduction[J]. Int. J. Bifurcat Chaos., 1991, 01(02):277-286.
[15] Saito Y, Mitsui T. Stability analysis of numerical schemes for stochastic differential equations[J]. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 1996, 33(6):2254-2267.
[16] Milstein G N, Repin Y M, Tretyakov M V. Numerical methods for stochastic systems preserving symplectic structure[J]. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 2002, 40(4):1583-1604.
[17] Yue C. Exponential mean-square stability of the improved split-step theta methods for non-autonomous stochastic differential equations[J]. Sci. China Math., 2017, 60:735-744.
[18] Burrage K, Tian T. The composite Euler method for stiff stochastic differential equations[J]. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 2001, 131(1):407-426.
[19] Kahl C, Schurz H. Balanced Milstein methods for ordinary SDEs[J]. Monte Carlo Methods Appl., 2006, 12(2):143-170.
[20] Milstein G N, Platen E, Schurz H. Balanced implicit methods for stiff stochastic systems[J]. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 1998, 35(3):1010-1019.
[21] Burrage K, Tian T. The composite Euler method for stiff stochastic differential equations[J]. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 2001, 131(1):407-426.
[22] Omar M A, Aboul-Hassan A-K, Rabia S. The composite Milstein methods for the numerical solution of Stratonovich stochastic differential equations[J]. Appl. Math. Comput., 2009, 215(2):727-745.
[23] Tian T H, Burrage K. Two-stage stochastic Runge-Kutta methods for stochastic differential equations[J]. BIT, 2002, 42:625-643.
[24] Tian T, Burrage K. Implicit Taylor methods for stiff stochastic differential equations[J]. Appl. Numer. Math., 2001, 38(1):167-185.
[25] Burrage K, Burrage P, Tian T. Numerical methods for strong solutions of stochastic differential equations:an overview[J]. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 2004, 460(2041):373-402.
[26] Xie Y, Zhang C J. Compensated split-step balanced methods for nonlinear stiff SDEs with jump-diffusion and piecewise continuous arguments[J]. Sci. China Math., 2020, 63:1-22.
[27] Wang X J, Gan S Q, Wang D S. A family of fully implicit Milstein methods for stiff stochastic differential equations with multiplicative noise[J]. BIT, 2012, 52:741-772.
[28] Li S F. Canonical Euler splitting method for nonlinear composite stiff evolution equations[J]. Appl. Math. Comput., 2016, 289:220-236.
[29] Gan S Q, Xiao A G, Wang D S. Stability of analytical and numerical solutions of nonlinear stochastic delay differential equations[J]. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 2014, 268(1):5-22.
[30] Huang C M, Gan S Q, Wang D S. Delay-dependent stability analysis of numerical methods for stochastic delay differential equations[J]. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 2012, 236(14):3514-3527.
[31] Huang C M. Exponential mean square stability of numerical methods for systems of stochastic differential equations[J]. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 2012, 236(16):4016-4026.
[32] Mao X R. Stochastic Differential Equations and Applications[M]. Cambridge:Woodhead Publishing, 2007.
[33] Mao X R, Rassias M J. Khasminskii-type theorems for stochastic differential delay equations[J]. Stoch. Anal. Appl., 2005, 23(5):1045-1069.
[34] Mao X R. Almost sure exponential stability in the numerical simulation of stochastic differential equations[J]. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 2015, 53(1):370-389.
[35] Mao X R. LaSalle-type theorems for stochastic differential delay equations[J]. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 1999, 236(2):350-369.
[36] Mao X R. A note on the LaSalle-type theorems for stochastic differential delay equations[J]. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 2002, 268(1):125-142.
[37] Higham D J, Kloeden P E. Numerical methods for nonlinear stochastic differential equations with jumps[J]. Numer. Math., 2005, 101(1):101-119.
[38] Wu F K, Mao X R, Szpruch L. Almost sure exponential stability of numerical solutions for stochastic delay differential equations[J]. Numer. Math., 2010, 115(4):681-697.
[39] Hairer E, Wanner G. Solving Ordinary Differential Equations Ⅱ:Stiff and Differential Algebraic Problems[M]. Springer Berl., 1996.
[40] Mao X R, Szpruch L. Strong convergence and stability of implicit numerical methods for stochastic differential equations with non-globally Lipschitz continuous coefficients[J]. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 2013, 238(1):14-28.
[41] 彭捷, 代新杰, 肖爱国, 卜玮平. 中立型随机延迟微分方程分裂步θ方法的强收敛性[J]. 计算数学, 2020, 42(1):18-38.
[42] 包学忠, 胡琳. 随机变延迟微分方程平衡方法的均方收敛性与稳定性[J]. 计算数学, 2021, 43(3):301-321.
[1] 邓定文, 赵紫琳. 求解二维Fisher-KPP方程的一类保正保界差分格式及其Richardson外推法[J]. 计算数学, 2022, 44(4): 561-584.
[2] 胡婧玮. 非线性玻尔兹曼方程的傅里叶谱方法[J]. 计算数学, 2022, 44(3): 289-304.
[3] 郭洁, 万中. 求解大规模极大极小问题的光滑化三项共轭梯度算法[J]. 计算数学, 2022, 44(3): 324-338.
[4] 包学忠, 胡琳, 产蔼宁. 线性随机变时滞微分方程指数Euler方法的收敛性和稳定性[J]. 计算数学, 2022, 44(3): 339-353.
[5] 霍振阳, 张静娜, 黄健飞. 多项Caputo分数阶随机微分方程的Euler-Maruyama方法[J]. 计算数学, 2022, 44(3): 354-367.
[6] 贾旻茜, 张宇欣, 游雄. Hamilton系统的对称辛广义加性Runge-Kutta方法[J]. 计算数学, 2022, 44(3): 379-395.
[7] 李步扬. 曲率流的参数化有限元逼近[J]. 计算数学, 2022, 44(2): 145-162.
[8] 杨学敏, 牛晶, 姚春华. 椭圆型界面问题的破裂再生核方法[J]. 计算数学, 2022, 44(2): 217-232.
[9] 马玉敏, 蔡邢菊. 求解带线性约束的凸优化的一类自适应不定线性化增广拉格朗日方法[J]. 计算数学, 2022, 44(2): 272-288.
[10] 邵新慧, 亢重博. 基于分数阶扩散方程的离散线性代数方程组迭代方法研究[J]. 计算数学, 2022, 44(1): 107-118.
[11] 古振东. 非线性弱奇性Volterra积分方程的谱配置法[J]. 计算数学, 2021, 43(4): 426-443.
[12] 高兴华, 李宏, 刘洋. 分布阶扩散—波动方程的有限元解的误差估计[J]. 计算数学, 2021, 43(4): 493-505.
[13] 包学忠, 胡琳. 随机变延迟微分方程平衡方法的均方收敛性与稳定性[J]. 计算数学, 2021, 43(3): 301-321.
[14] 李旭, 李明翔. 连续Sylvester方程的广义正定和反Hermitian分裂迭代法及其超松弛加速[J]. 计算数学, 2021, 43(3): 354-366.
[15] 张丽丽, 任志茹. 改进的分块模方法求解对角占优线性互补问题[J]. 计算数学, 2021, 43(3): 401-412.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

季刊，创刊于1979年
主办：中国科学院数学与系统科学研究院
ISSN 0254-7791
CN 11-2125/O1
地址：北京市海淀区中关村东路55号　
邮编：100190
电话：(010) 82541423　
E-mail:gxy@lsec.cc.ac.cn
×

扫码分享